New Murriale
Suppose that the Governor had legally exercised much the Office of Chief Secretary or Commissioner, but the Supreme Court Ordinance of 1844 (Clause 8) only gives the Governor power to appoint a fit & proper person. Restrictive provisions in the case of the Chief Justice.
It would certainly have been more satisfactory if Sir J. Dowling had explained his legal reasons for this step. There are strong arguments against this course, which there is some subsequent amending legislation, one of which I am not fully informed. It might not wholly be as well to discuss generally, but would it not be best to print out the doubt confidentially?
Jan 8
W Ball
237
Jan 9
Page 240
Page 241
New Murriale
Spussume that the God = had legally Joriento much the Office of Chef Santril Commiferir, but the Supreme Court
Aidensive of 145- (& Clouse) only pies the Gods Juwer to appoint fit & proper prevson. Rest Corrence pioners / in the
P
case of the chevel
onellness of the
Chief Justice.
8 lan
گویا
W Ball
237
It would certainly have her more Satisfactory if Sir ). Dowing had explained
D
his legal
Reasons
for this step. Inardiname 199mhe Klainly against this course, walch
there is some subsequent amending
one
of which I am est informed. It might
not
hohilly be as well to acharchon genually
best to print out the doubt confidentially?
I'm Jan 8 mq Jan"
M. 9.
Page 240Page 241
اقطابه ....
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.